4.2 Article

Production of a chimeric allergen derived from the major allergen group 1 of house dust mite species in Nicotiana benthamiana

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 74, 期 5, 页码 531-537

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2013.01.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30872367, 81172790]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province of China [070413088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants are widely accepted as a general platform for the large-scale production of recombinant proteins, which has been demonstrated by the successful expression of various exogenous proteins. Using plants as a bioreactor for mass production of target proteins for vaccines is thought to show the most potential. This study explores whether a chimeric allergen R8, derived from the major allergen group 1 of house dust mites species (Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus), is expressed in tobacco. The highly efficient and useful Tovacco mosaic virus RNA-based overexpression (TRBO) vector was used to investigate expression of the R8 molecule in tobacco by agroinfection. Presence of R8 was detected using SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. Purified allergens were characterized using IgE-binding activity assay and allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) in murine asthmatic models. The recombinant R8 was successfully expressed in tobacco leaves. The pro-peptide was observed in the herbaceous leaf extracts. This protein exhibits properties similar to the parental allergen ProDer f 1 expressed in Escherichia coli or tobacco with respect to IgE immunoreactivity. R8 also rectifies imbalance of TH1/TH2 cells. An herbaceous plant expression system model allows mass production of R8, which might be used in the future for diagnosis of asthma or production of a candidate vaccine for allergen-specific immunotherapy of asthma. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据