4.2 Article

Effect of donor CTLA-4 alleles and haplotypes on graft-versus-host disease occurrence in Tunisian patients receiving a human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplant

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 72, 期 2, 页码 139-143

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.11.008

关键词

HSCT; GVHD; CTLA-4; Polymorphism; Tunisians

资金

  1. Tunisian Ministry for Higher education, Scientific Research and technology
  2. Tunisian Ministry of Public Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CTLA-4 genetic variation, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may be critical and can affect the functional activity of cells that initiate the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) effects. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of donor C7IA-4 alleles and haplotypes for the -318C>T and the 49A>G polymorphisms on the occurrence of GVHD in Tunisians recipients of HSCs. A total of 112 patients and their 112 respective sibling donors of HSCs were enrolled in this study. All patients had either grades 0-1 or grades II-IV acute GVHD, or chronic GVHD. The SNPs genotyping assay was performed using sets of sequence specific primers (SSP-PCR). The single marker association analysis showed that the 49G allele, in a genetic recessive model, may be a potential risk factor only for the chronic GVHD (p = 0.032, odds ratio [OR] = 2.58. 95% confidence interval = 1.05-6.32). The haplotypes analyses showed that the CTIA-4 - 318C49G nucleotide combination is significantly associated with the incidence of chronic GVHD (p = 0.043, x(2) = 3.27). Donor CTLA-4 - 318C49G haplotype may be a significant risk factor for developing chronic GVHD after allo-stem cell transplantation. We suppose that donor T cells expressing this haplotype in a homozygous state have higher proliferation than those expressing other haplotypes, especially after recognition of the recipient's minor histocompatibility antigens. (C) 2011 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据