4.2 Article

Next-generation sequencing: the solution for high-resolution, unambiguous human leukocyte antigen typing

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 71, 期 10, 页码 1033-1042

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.06.016

关键词

HLA polymorphism; Ambiguities; DNA sequencing; High-resolution HLA typing

资金

  1. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing has been a challenge for more than 50 years. Current methods (Sanger sequencing, sequence-specific primers [SSP], sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes [SSOP]) continue to generate ambiguities that are time-consuming and expensive to resolve. However, next-generation sequencing (NGS) overcomes ambiguity through the combination of clonal amplification, which provides on-phase sequence and a high level of parallelism, whereby millions of sequencing reads are produced enabling an expansion of the HLA regions sequenced. We explored HLA typing using NGS through a three-step process. First, HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 were amplified with long-range PCR. Subsequently, amplicons were sequenced using the 454 GS-FLX platform. Finally, sequencing data were analyzed with Assign-NG software. In a single experiment, four individual samples and two mixtures were sequenced producing >75 Mb of sequence from >300,000 individual sequence reads (average length, 244 b). The reads were aligned and covered 100% of the regions amplified. Allele assignment was 100% concordant with the known HLA alleles of our samples. Our results suggest this method can be a useful tool for complete genomic characterization of new HLA alleles and for completion of sequence for existing, partially sequenced alleles. NGS can provide complete, unambiguous, high-resolution HLA typing; however, further evaluation is needed to explore the feasibility of its routine use. (C) 2010 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据