4.2 Article

Genetic and diabetic auto-antibody markers in Saudi children with type 1 diabetes

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 71, 期 12, 页码 1238-1242

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.09.008

关键词

T1DM; HLA; GAD; ICA 512; SSP

资金

  1. King Saud University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human leukocyte antigen DRB1 and DQB1 contribute to the genetic susceptibility of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and they are involved in the induction of the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells precipitating the disease The objective of this study was to examine diabetic auto-antibodies (ICA-512 GAD65) and the HLA-DR/DQ genotype among T1DM Saudi children in a cross-sectional study conducted at King Khalid University and National Guard Hospitals Riyadh Subjects included in this study were 103 Saudi patients and 180 healthy controls In all 41% of patients were positive for ICA512 73 3% positive for GAD65 and 27 3% had both antibodies The risk alleles were DRB1 0301 (odds ratio [OR] = 11 1) DRB1*0405 (OR = 6 02) DRB1*0401 (OR = 5 8) DQB1*0201 (OR, 17 69) and DQB1*0302 (OR = 3 77) In addition the DRB1*03/04-DQB1*02/0302 (OR = 123 4) is positively associated with T1DM However DRB1*0403 (OR = 0 27) DRB1*1101 (OR = 0 049) DRB1*1307 (OR = 0 28) DRB1*1501 (OR = 0 12) DQB1*0301 (OR = 0 03) DQB1*0401 (OR = 0 04) and DQB1*0602 (OR = 0 16) were protective Among GAD-positive patients 81% were DRB1*0301 68 75% were DQB1*0201 62 5% were DRB1*0405 43 75% were DQB1*0302 and 43 7% were DRB1*03/04 Among ICA512-positive patients all were DRB1*0301 66 6% were DQB1*0201 55% were DRB1*0405 33 3% were DQB1*0302 and 55% were DRB1 03/04 In conclusion these results show a strong association of HLA-DQB1*0201/0302 and DRB1*03/04 with T1DM Thus combining genetic markers with autoantibody is useful in a screening program for early detection of T1DM among Saudi children (C) 2010 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据