4.2 Article

Differential monocyte STAT6 activation and CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells in kidney operational tolerance transplanted individuals

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 442-450

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.01.022

关键词

Kidney transplantation; Operational tolerance; Foxp3; STAT6; Monocytes

资金

  1. FAPESP [06/04133-7]
  2. CNPq MCT/BID (Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In organ transplantation, the immunosuppression withdrawal leads, in most cases, to rejection. Nonetheless, a special group of patients maintain stable graft function after complete withdrawal of immunosuppression, achieving a state called operational tolerance. The study of such patients may be important to understand the mechanisms involved in human transplantation tolerance. We compared the profile of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cells and the signaling pathways IL-6/STAT3 (signal transducers and activators of transcription) and IL-4/STAT6 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of four kidney transplant groups: (i) operational tolerance (OT), (ii) chronic allograft nephropathy (CR), (iii) stable graft function under standard immunosuppression (Sta), (iv) stable graft function under low immunosuppression, and (v) healthy individuals. Both CR and Sta displayed lower numbers and percentages of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cells compared with all other groups (p < 0.05). The OT patients displayed a reduced activation of the IL-4/STAT6 pathway in monocytes, compared with all other groups (p < 0.05). The lower numbers of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cells observed in CR individuals may be a feature of chronic allograft nephropathy. The differential OT signaling profile, with reduced phosphorylation of STAT6, in monocytes' region, suggests that some altered function of STAT6 signaling may be important for the operational tolerance state. Crown copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据