4.2 Article

Functional variants of the P2RX7 gene, aseptic osteolysis, and revision of the total hip arthroplasty:A preliminary study

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 201-205

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.10.013

关键词

Aseptic loosening; Genetic polymorphism; Osteolysis; Purinergic signaling; Bone turnover

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Czech Republic [IGA MZ CR NR 9490]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Periprosthetic osteolysis (OL) is a major long-term complication of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) which can, result in aseptic loosening and revision Surgery. Purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel 7 (P2RX7) is an important regulator of inflammation and bone turnover. We were therefore interested in whether functional variants of the P2RX7 gene may be associated with OL and risk of THA failure. A total of 205 unrelated Czech patients with cementless-type THA were stratified according to the severity of acetabular OL and revision of THA. Four loss-of-function P2PX7 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), namely Glu496Ala, Ile568Asn, AFg307ln, and null allele (rs35933842), were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). No significant association of P2RX7 variants with severity of OL was observed. The carriers of rare variants P2RX7 568Asn, 307Gln and null allele, all causing complete loss of P2RX7 function, tended to be overrepresented among patients with THA revision (9.6%) by comparison with those with unrevised functional prosthesis (2.1%, p = 0.09). Furthermore, the carriage of the P2RX7 307Gln allele was associated with greater cumulative hazard of THA revision (p = 0.02). In this preliminary study, we could nominate but not clearly demonstrate rare P2RX7 loss-of-function variants being associated with THA failure. Investigation in large THA cohorts is therefore warranted. (C) 2010 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据