4.0 Article

Likelihood-based association analysis for nuclear families and unrelated subjects with missing genotype data

期刊

HUMAN HEREDITY
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 87-98

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000119108

关键词

conditional likelihood; family-based association tests; missing data; population stratification; transmission/disequilibrium test; unphased genotype data

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U105260799, U.1052.00.003.00002.01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MC_U105260799] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Missing data occur in genetic association studies for several reasons including missing family members and uncertain haplotype phase. Maximum likelihood is a commonly used approach to accommodate missing data, but it can be difficult to apply to family-based association studies, because of possible loss of robustness to confounding by population stratification. Here a novel likelihood for nuclear families is proposed, in which distinct sets of association parameters are used to model the parental genotypes and the offspring genotypes. This approach is robust to population structure when the data are complete, and has only minor loss of robustness when there are missing data. It also allows a novel conditioning step that gives valid analysis for multiple offspring in the presence of linkage. Unrelated subjects are included by regarding them as the children of two missing parents. Simulations and theory indicate similar operating characteristics to TRANSMIT, but with no bias with missing data in the presence of linkage. In comparison with FBAT and PCPH, the proposed model is slightly less robust to population structure but has greater power to detect strong effects. In comparison to APL and MITDT, the model is more robust to stratification and can accommodate sibships of any size. The methods are implemented for binary and continuous traits in software, UNPHASED, available from the author. Copyright (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据