4.6 Article

A novel rearrangement of occludin causes brain calcification and renal dysfunction

期刊

HUMAN GENETICS
卷 132, 期 11, 页码 1223-1234

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-013-1327-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Genome Canada
  2. Genome Atlantic
  3. Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation
  4. Nova Scotia Research and Innovation Trust
  5. Dalhousie Faculty of Medicine
  6. Capital District Health Authority
  7. IWK Health Centre Foundation
  8. Capital Health Research Fund
  9. Beatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute
  10. Terry Fox Strategic Health Research Training Program in Cancer Research from CIHR
  11. Centre de Recherche du CHU Ste-Justine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pediatric intracranial calcification may be caused by inherited or acquired factors. We describe the identification of a novel rearrangement in which a downstream pseudogene translocates into exon 9 of OCLN, resulting in band-like brain calcification and advanced chronic kidney disease in early childhood. SNP genotyping and read-depth variation from whole exome sequencing initially pointed to a mutation in the OCLN gene. The high degree of identity between OCLN and two pseudogenes required a combination of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, PCR, and Sanger sequencing to identify the genomic rearrangement that was the underlying genetic cause of the disease. Mutations in exon 3, or at the 5-6 intron splice site, of OCLN have been reported to cause brain calcification and polymicrogyria with no evidence of extra-cranial phenotypes. Of the OCLN splice variants described, all make use of exon 9, while OCLN variants that use exons 3, 5, and 6 are tissue specific. The genetic rearrangement we identified in exon 9 provides a plausible explanation for the expanded clinical phenotype observed in our individuals. Furthermore, the lack of polymicrogyria associated with the rearrangement of OCLN in our patients extends the range of cranial defects that can be observed due to OCLN mutations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据