4.6 Article

Gene-environment interactions and obesity traits among postmenopausal African-American and Hispanic women in the Women's Health Initiative SHARe Study

期刊

HUMAN GENETICS
卷 132, 期 3, 页码 323-336

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-012-1246-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vanderbilt Clinical and Translational Research Scholar award [5KL2RR024975]
  2. Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health career development program [K12HD4383]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of obesity measures have identified associations with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). However, no large-scale evaluation of gene-environment interactions has been performed. We conducted a search of gene-environment (G x E) interactions in post-menopausal African-American and Hispanic women from the Women's Health Initiative SNP Health Association Resource GWAS study. Single SNP linear regression on body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip circumference ratio (WHR) adjusted for multidimensional-scaling-derived axes of ancestry and age was run in race-stratified data with 871,512 SNPs available from African-Americans (N = 8,203) and 786,776 SNPs from Hispanics (N = 3,484). Tests of G x E interaction at all SNPs for recreational physical activity (m h/week), dietary energy intake (kcal/day), alcohol intake (categorical), cigarette smoking years, and cigarette smoking (ever vs. never) were run in African-Americans and Hispanics adjusted for ancestry and age at interview, followed by meta-analysis of G x E interaction terms. The strongest evidence for concordant G x E interactions in African-Americans and Hispanics was for smoking and marker rs10133840 (Q statistic P = 0.70, beta = -0.01, P = 3.81 x 10(-7)) with BMI as the outcome. The strongest evidence for G x E interaction within a cohort was in African-Americans with WHR as outcome for dietary energy intake and rs9557704 (SNP x kcal = -0.04, P = 2.17 x 10(-7)). No results exceeded the Bonferroni-corrected statistical significance threshold.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据