4.6 Review

From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance

期刊

HUMAN GENETICS
卷 130, 期 3, 页码 377-382

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT081407/Z/06/Z]
  2. ESRC/EPSRC [EP/G002541/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/G002541/2, EP/G002541/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G002541/2, EP/G002541/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The future holds the possibility to link and network biobanks, existing biorepositories and reference databases for research purposes in ways that have not been possible before. There is the potential to develop 'research portals' that will enable researchers to access these research resources that are located around the globe with the click of a mouse. In this paper, I will argue that our current governance system for research is unable to provide all of the oversight and accountability mechanisms that are required for this new way of doing research that is based upon flows of data across international borders. For example, our current governance framework for research is nationally based, with a complex system of laws, policies and practice that can be unique to a jurisdiction. It is also evident that many of the nationally based governance bodies in this field do not have the legal powers or expertise to adjudicate on the complex issues, such as privacy and disclosure risks that are raised by cross-border data sharing. In addition, the conceptual underpinning of this research governance structure is based on the one researcher, one project, one jurisdiction model. In the conclusion of this paper, I lay out some preliminary ideas as to how this system has to change to accommodate research that is based on networks. I suggest that a move to digital governance mechanisms might be a start to making research governance systems more appropriate for the 21st century.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据