4.7 Article

The Default Mode Network is Disrupted in Parkinson's Disease with Visual Hallucinations

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 5658-5666

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22577

关键词

resting; function; MRI; cortical thickness; coactivation

资金

  1. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong
  2. Wellcome Trust [088324]
  3. National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (Suckling)
  4. MRC [MC_U105597119] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G0001354, MC_U105597119, G1000183B, G0001354B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Visual hallucinations (VH) are one of the most striking nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), and predict dementia and mortality. Aberrant default mode network (DMN) is associated with other psychoses. Here, we tested the hypothesis that DMN dysfunction contributes to VH in PD. Methods: Resting state functional data was acquired from individuals with PD with VH (PDVH) and without VH (PDnonVH), matched for levodopa drug equivalent dose, and a healthy control group (HC). Independent component analysis was used to investigate group differences in functional connectivity within the DMN. In addition, we investigated whether the functional changes associated with hallucinations were accompanied by differences in cortical thickness. Results: There were no group differences in cortical thickness but functional coactivation within components of the DMN was significantly lower in both PDVH and PDnonVH groups compared to HC. Functional coactivation within the DMN was found to be greater in PDVH group relative to PDnonVH group. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates, for the first time that, within a functionally abnormal DMN in PD, relatively higher connectivity is associated with VH. We postulate that aberrant connectivity in a large scale network affects sensory information processing and perception, and contributes to positive symptom generation in PD. Hum Brain Mapp 35:5658-5666, 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据