4.7 Article

Voxelwise multivariate analysis of multimodality magnetic resonance imaging

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 831-846

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22217

关键词

multiple comparisons; diffusion tensor imaging; structural magnetic resonance imaging; multivariate analysis; Alzheimer's disease; perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging; multimodality imaging

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [T32 MH017119, U01 HL089856, R01 MH081862, R01 MH087590, R21EB013795, R01 CA157528]
  2. NIH [R03EB008136, P41EB015904, P50AG023501, P01AG19724]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies concentrate on a single MRI contrast or modality, frequently structural MRI. By performing an integrated analysis of several modalities, such as structural, perfusion-weighted, and diffusion-weighted MRI, new insights may be attained to better understand the underlying processes of brain diseases. We compare two voxelwise approaches: (1) fitting multiple univariate models, one for each outcome and then adjusting for multiple comparisons among the outcomes and (2) fitting a multivariate model. In both cases, adjustment for multiple comparisons is performed over all voxels jointly to account for the search over the brain. The multivariate model is able to account for the multiple comparisons over outcomes without assuming independence because the covariance structure between modalities is estimated. Simulations show that the multivariate approach is more powerful when the outcomes are correlated and, even when the outcomes are independent, the multivariate approach is just as powerful or more powerful when at least two outcomes are dependent on predictors in the model. However, multiple univariate regressions with Bonferroni correction remain a desirable alternative in some circumstances. To illustrate the power of each approach, we analyze a case control study of Alzheimer's disease, in which data from three MRI modalities are available. Hum Brain Mapp 35:831-846, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据