4.7 Article

Atlas-Based Segmentation of Developing Tissues in the Human Brain with Quantitative Validation in Young Fetuses

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 1348-1358

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20935

关键词

MRI, fetal brain; segmentation, validation

资金

  1. NIH [R01 NS 055064, K23 NS 52506]
  2. European Research Council [FP7/2007-2013 207667]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imaging of the human fetus using magnetic resonance (MR) is an essential tool for quantitative studies of normal as well as abnormal brain development in utero However, because of fundamental differences in tissue types, tissue properties and tissue distribution between the fetal and adult brain, automated tissue segmentation techniques developed for adult brain anatomy are unsuitable for this data In this paper, we describe methodology for automatic atlas-based segmentation of individual tissue types in motion-corrected 3D volumes reconstructed from clinical MR scans of the fetal brain To generate anatomically correct automatic segmentations, we create a set of accurate manual delineations and build an in utero 3D statistical atlas of tissue distribution incorporating developing gray and white matter as well as transient tissue types such as the germinal matrix. The probabilistic atlas is associated with an unbiased average shape and intensity template for registration of new subject images to the space of the atlas Quantitative whole brain 3D validation of tissue labeling performed on a set of 14 fetal MR scans (20 57-22 86 weeks gestational age) demonstrates that this atlas-based EM segmentation approach achieves consistently high DSC performance for the main tissue types in the fetal brain This work indicates that reliable measures of brain development can be automatically derived from clinical MR imaging and opens up possibility of further 3D volumetric and morphometric studies with multiple fetal subjects Hum Brain Mapp 31 1348-1358, 2070. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据