4.7 Article

Control of Shared Representations Relies on Key Processes Involved in Mental State Attribution

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 3704-3718

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20800

关键词

agency; anterior fronto-median cortex; fMRI; mentalizing; mirror system; social cognition; temporo-parietal junction

资金

  1. NEST/EDICI (European Community's Sixth Framework Programme) [012929]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Action observation leads to the automatic activation of the corresponding motor representation in the observer through mirror-matching. This constitutes a shared representational system, which is thought to subserve social understanding by motor simulation. However, it is unclear how these shared representations can be controlled and distinguished. Brain imaging Suggests that controlling shared representations, indexed by the ability to control automatic imitative responses, activates anterior fronto-median cortex (aFMC), and temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). Crucially, these regions are also consistently implicated in mental state attribution and have provided an alternative account for higher-level social cognition. Here, we directly tested whether social-cognitive processes involve similar key computational mechanisms as the control of shared representations by using functional brain imaging to reveal overlapping brain circuits. We show in a within-subject design that commonly activated regions occurred selectively in aFMC and TPJ. Mentalizing and self-referential thoughts recruited a region in aFMC, which was also activated when controlling imitation. In the TPJ, an area overlapped between mentalizing, agency processing, and imitative control. Behavioral and neural correlates of mentalizing were further related to the individual ability for controlling imitation. Our findings support the assumption of shared key processes and suggest a novel link between embodied and social cognition. Hum Brain Mapp 30:3704-3718, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据