4.7 Article

fMRI Evidence for Multisensory Recruitment Associated With Rapid Eye Movements During Sleep

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 1705-1722

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20635

关键词

fMRI; REM; thalamic reticular nucleus; multisensory; oculomotor circuit; visual scanning

资金

  1. NCRR [M01-RR00052, P41-RR15241]
  2. NTMH [R01-MH43326]
  3. NIBIB [R01-EB000840, R01-EB005846, R01-EB004130]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the neural correlates of rapid eye movement during sleep (REM) by timing REMs from video recording and using rapid event-related functional MRI. Consistent with the hypothesis that REMs share the brain systems and mechanisms with waking eye movements and are visually-targeted saccades, we found REM-locked activation in the primary visual cortex, thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN), 'visual claustrum', retrosplenial cortex (RSC, only on the right hemisphere), fusiform gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and the oculomotor circuit that controls awake saccadic eye movements (and subserves awake visuospatial attention). Unexpectedly, robust activation also occurred in non-visual sensory cortices, motor cortex, language areas, and the ascending reticular activating system, including basal forebrain, the major source of cholinergic input to the entire cortex. REM-associated activation of these areas, especially non-visual primary sensory cortices, TRN and claustrum, parallels findings from waking studies on the interactions between multiple sensory data, and their 'binding' into a unified percept, suggesting that these mechanisms are also shared in waking and dreaming and that the sharing goes beyond the expected visual scanning mechanisms. Surprisingly, REMs were associated with a decrease in signal in specific periventricular subregions, matching the distribution of the serotonergic supraependymal plexus. REMs might serve as a useful task-free probe into major brain systems for functional brain imaging. Hunt Brain Mapp 30:1705-1722, 2009. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss. Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据