4.7 Article

Amygdala Damage Affects Event-Related Potentials for Fearful Faces at Specific Time Windows

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 1089-1105

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20921

关键词

ERP; medial temporal lobe epilepsy; emotion; P1; late-P3; SPM5

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. MRC
  3. ESRC-MRC
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation
  5. Royal Society
  6. MRC [G0500784] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [G0500784] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The amygdala is known to influence processing of threat-related stimuli in distant brain regions, including visual cortex. The time-course of these distant influences is unknown, although this information is important for resolving debates over likely pathways mediating an apparent rapidity in emotional processing. To address this, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) to seen fearful face expressions, in pre-operative patients with medial temporal lobe epilepsy who had varying degrees of amygdala pathology, plus healthy volunteers. We found that amygdala damage diminished ERPs for fearful versus neutral faces within the P1 time-range, similar to 100-150 ms, and for a later component at similar to 500-600 ms. Individual severity of amygdala damage determined the magnitude of both these effects, consistent with a causal amygdala role. By contrast, amygdala damage did not affect explicit perception of fearful expressions nor a distinct emotional ERP effect at 150-250 ms. These results demonstrate two distinct time-points at which the amygdala influences fear processing. The data also demonstrate that while not all aspects of expression processing are disrupted by amygdala damage, there is a crucial impact on an early P1 component. These findings are consistent with the existence of multiple processing stages or routes for fearful faces that vary in their dependence on amygdala function. Hum Brain Mapp 31:1089-1105, 2010. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据