4.7 Article

Development of Cortical Connections as Measured by EEG Coherence and Phase Delays

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 1400-1415

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20474

关键词

development of EEG coherence; EEG phase differences; cortical connections; two-compartmental model of cortico-cortical connectivity; complexity development

资金

  1. USDA [HRD-0200]
  2. NIH [RR08079-0951]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to explore human development of EEG coherence and phase differences over the period from infancy to 16 years of age. The electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from 19 scalp locations from 458 subjects ranging in age from 2 months to 16.67 years. EEG coherence and EEG phase differences were computed for the left and right hemispheres in the posterior-to-anterior direction (O1/2-P3/4, O1/2-C3/4, O1/2-F3/4, and O1/2-Fp1/2) and the anterior-to-posterior direction (Fp1/2-F3/4, Fp1/2-C3/4, Fp1/2-P3/4, and Fp1/2-O1/2) in the beta frequency band (13-25 Hz). Sliding averages of EEG coherence and phase were computed using 1 year averages and 9 month overlapping that produced 64 means from 0.44 years of age to 16.22 years of age. Rhythmic oscillations in coherence and phase were noted in all electrode combinations. Different developmental trajectories were present for coherence and phase differences and for anterior-to-posterior and posterior-to-anterior directions and inter-electrode distance. Large changes in EEG coherence and phase were present from similar to 6 months to 4 years of age followed by a significant linear trend to higher coherence in short distance inter-electrode distances and longer phase delays in long inter-electrode distances. The results are consistent with a genetic model of rhythmic long tern connection formation that occurs in cycles along a curvilinear trajectory toward adulthood. Competition for dendritic space, development of complexity, and nonlinear dynamic oscillations are discussed. Hum Brain Mapp 29:1400-1415, 2008. (C) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据