4.3 Article

The use of complementary and alternative medicine among dermatology outpatients in Eastern Turkey

期刊

HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 214-221

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0960327113494904

关键词

Complementary and alternative medicine; dermatology; herbal therapy; skin disease; side effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Over the past decade, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has become increasingly popular around the world. Objectives: In this study, we aim to investigate how frequently CAM is used and the types of CAM methods used for dermatological disease in Eastern Turkey. Materials and methods: We recruited 1610 patients from our clinic for this study. The sociodemographic features and the CAM methods were investigated with a survey. Results: The most common dermatological disorders included contact dermatitis (21.4%), acne vulgaris (17.5%), fungal infections (10.9%), eczema (6.3%), and warts (5.7%). The ratio of patients using at least one CAM method was 43.7% and that of those using two or more CAM methods was 20.8%. The most commonly used CAM methods were those using henna, cologne, moisturizing cream, prayer, and herbal therapy. Some patients were found to use some interesting and unusual CAM methods, such as putting out a cigarette over the skin on the back for anthrax, applying raw meat for furuncle, using fuel oil and nitric acid for contact dermatitis. Conclusions: CAM methods are commonly used in our population. CAM methods often cause adverse reactions that may alter diagnostic skin findings and interfere with the efficacy of other medical therapies. Therefore, physicians should ask their patients about the use of CAM methods while collecting patient history. Physicians have a critical role in preventing improper use of CAM. In addition, further investigations into the efficacy, benefits, and risks of CAM methods should be carried out for better insight into those CAM methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据