4.3 Article

Vasorelaxant effects of mercury on rat thoracic aorta: The nitric oxide signaling mechanism

期刊

HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 33, 期 9, 页码 904-910

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0960327113512341

关键词

Rat aorta; mercury; endothelium; NO; EDHF; Ca2+ channels; oxidative stress

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mercury, a heavy metal, is widespread and persistent in the environment and has been elucidated as a possible risk factor in cardiovascular diseases. Mercury has been reported to selectively impair the nitric oxide (NO) pathway in the vascular endothelium as a consequence of oxidative stress. Conversely, mercury per se causes endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation at lower concentration via the NO pathway. Little is known about the effects of mercury per se on other endothelial mediators. To elucidate possible mechanisms involved in this action, isometric tension was measured in aortic rings precontracted with phenylephrine (10 mu M) from Wistar rats. Responses to increasing concentrations of inorganic mercuric chloride (10(-12)-10(-5) M) were obtained in the presence and absence of endothelium. Inorganic mercury produced a biphasic response in endothelium-intact aortic rings and produced only vasoconstriction in endothelium-denuded aortic rings. To study the possible underlying mechanisms for the biphasic response of mercury, increasing concentrations of mercuric chloride (10(-12)-10(-5) M) were used before and after N-G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME (10(-4) M)), glybenclamide (10(-5) M), superoxide dismutase (10 U/ml) + catalase (100 U/ml), and nifedipine (10(-4) M) treatment. Results suggest that mercury produces endothelium-dependent relaxation at low concentration mediated by endothelial-generated NO and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor and endothelium-independent contraction resulting from the blockade of L-type Ca2+ channels by generation of free radicals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据