4.3 Article

The role of adenosine receptors on amitriptyline-induced electrophysiological changes on rat atrium

期刊

HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 62-69

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0960327112455670

关键词

Amitriptyline; adenosine receptor antagonists; cardiac action potential

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [107S251]
  2. Turkish Academy of Sciences [EA-TUBA-GEBIP/2001-2-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the role of adenosine receptors in amitriptyline-induced cardiac action potential (AP) changes in isolated rat atria. In the first group, APs were recorded after cumulative addition of amitriptyline (1 mu M, 10 mu M and 50 mu M). In other groups, each atrium was incubated with selective adenosine A(1) antagonist (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), 10(-4) M) or selective adenosine A(2a) receptor antagonist (8-(3-chlorostyryl) caffeine, 10(-5) M) before amitriptyline administration. Resting membrane potential, AP amplitude (APA), AP duration at 50% and 80% of repolarization (APD(50) and APD(80), respectively), and the maximum rise and decay slopes of AP were recorded. Amitriptyline (50 mu M) prolonged the APD(50) and APD(80) (p < 0.001) and the maximum rise slope of AP was reduced by amitriptyline (p < 0.0001). Amitriptyline reduced maximum decay slope of AP only at 50 mu M (p < 0.01). DPCPX significantly decreased the 50-mu M amitriptyline-induced APD(50) and APD(80) prolongation (p < 0.001). DPCPX significantly prevented the effects of amitriptyline (1 mu M and 50 mu M) on maximum rise slope of AP (p < 0.05). DPCPX significantly prevented the amitriptyline-induced (50 mu M) reduction in maximum decay slope of AP (p < 0.001). The selective adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist prevented the electrophysiological effects of amitriptyline on atrial AP. A(1) receptor stimulation may be responsible for the cardiovascular toxic effects produced by amitriptyline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据