4.3 Article

Oxidative stress induced by urban fine particles in cultured EA.hy926 cells

期刊

HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 579-590

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0960327110374207

关键词

PM2.5; cytotoxicity; oxidative stress; elements; endothelia cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10875170]
  2. MOST [2006CB705603]
  3. CAS [99M4004M04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been reported that vascular endothelia cell damage is an important precursor to the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular disease exposed to airborne particulate matter (PM). The present study investigated the hypothesis that urban fine (PM2.5) particles could cause cytotoxicity via oxidative stress in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, EA.hy926. The concentrations of metal elements (Cr, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mo, Cd and Pb) in PM2.5 suspension, water-soluble and water-insoluble fractions of PM2.5 were determined by inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Iron (Fe), Zn and Pb were highly enriched in all the samples. Exposure of the cultured EA.hy926 cells to PM2.5 suspension, water-soluble and water-insoluble fractions of PM2.5 led to cell death, reactive oxygen species (ROS) increase, mitochondrial transmembrane potential (Delta Psi m) disruption and NF-kappa B activation, respectively. The ROS increase by exposure to PM2.5 suspension, water-soluble and water-insoluble fractions of PM2.5 triggered the activation of nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B, which means that PM2.5 particles exert cytotoxicity by an apopotic process. However, the induction of cytotoxicity by PM2.5 suspension, water-soluble and water-insoluble fractions of PM2.5 was reversed by pretreatment with superoxide dismutase (SOD). These results suggest that each fraction of PM2.5 has a potency to cause oxidative stress in endothelial cells. ROS was generated through PM2.5-mediated mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, which may induce direct interaction between metal elements and endothelia cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据