4.4 Article

Repeatability of baseline and stress-induced corticosterone levels across early life stages in the Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens)

期刊

HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 497-502

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.01.010

关键词

Glucocorticoids; Stress response; Repeatability; Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; Physiological phenotype; Florida scrub-jay

资金

  1. NSF [IBN-0346328, IOS-0919899]
  2. Sigma Xi
  3. American Ornithologists' Union
  4. Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
  5. University of Memphis Ecological Research Center
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences
  7. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0919899] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have posited that the pattern of glucocorticoid secretion within an individual represents a stable, fixed physiological trait To test this hypothesis, we assessed the repeatability of baseline and stress-induced corticosterone (CORT) secretion across developmental stages and years in Florida scrub-jays. We sampled individuals from multiple cohorts repeatedly from the age of 11 days post-hatch up to 4 years of age. We found a significant degree of repeatability within individuals in stress-induced corticosterone levels, i.e., the amount of hormone secreted during a standardized stress protocol (corrected integrated corticosterone). However, baseline corticosterone levels were not statistically repeatable, although there was some indication that nestling levels predicted levels at 1 year of age. The results of this study indicate that stress-induced CURT levels are consistent within individual scrub-jays, and the degree to which a young jay mounts an acute stress response appears to be somewhat set by the age of nutritional independence. Thus stress-induced corticosterone secretion appears to be a stable, repeatable trait within individuals and as such may be subject to natural selection. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据