4.4 Review

Estrogens and age-related memory decline in rodents: What have we learned and where do we go from here?

期刊

HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR
卷 55, 期 1, 页码 2-23

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.08.015

关键词

Estradiol; Aging; Hippocampus; Rat; Mouse; Menopause; Hormone therapy

资金

  1. Yale University
  2. American Federation for Aging Research/Pfizer [IIRG-03-6051]
  3. Alzheimer's Association
  4. NIMH [MH065460]
  5. NIH [AG022525]
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R03MH065460] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG022525] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The question of whether ovarian hormone therapy can prevent or reduce age-related memory decline in menopausal women has been the subject of much recent debate. Although numerous studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of estrogen and/or progestin therapy for certain types of memory in menopausal women, recent clinical trials suggest that such therapy actually increases the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Because rodent models have been frequently used to examine the effects of age and/or ovarian hormone deficiency on mnemonic function, rodent models of age-related hormone and memory decline may be useful in helping to resolve this issue. This review will focus on evidence suggesting that estradiol modulates memory, particularly hippocampal-dependent memory, in young and aging female rats and mice. Various factors affecting the mnemonic response to estradiol in aging females will be highlighted to illustrate the complications inherent to studies of estrogen therapy in aging females. Avenues for future development of estradiol-based therapies will also be discussed, and it is argued that an approach to drug development based on identifying the molecular mechanisms underlying estrogenic modulation of memory may lead to promising future treatments for reducing age-related mnemonic decline. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据