4.3 Article

Challenges of Disorders of Sex Development: Diverse Perceptions across Stakeholders

期刊

HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS
卷 78, 期 1, 页码 40-46

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000339863

关键词

Disorders of sex development; Health-related quality of life; Interdisciplinary teams; Pediatric urology; Pediatric endocrinology; Mental health professionals

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R21HD044398, R01HD053637]
  2. Capital Region Medical Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Disorders of sex development (DSD) are congenital conditions in which chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex development is atypical. Optimal management is patient- and family-centered and delivered by interdisciplinary teams. The present pilot study elicits concerns held by important stakeholders on issues affecting young patients with DSD and their families. Methods: Content from focus groups with expert clinicians (pediatric urologists (n = 7), pediatric endocrinologists (n = 10), mental health professionals (n = 4), DSD patient advocates (n = 4), and interviews with parents of DSD-affected children (newborn to 6 years; n = 11) was coded and content-analyzed to identify health-related quality of life issues. Results: Key stressors varied across stakeholder groups. In general, family-centered issues were noted more than child-centered. In the child-centered domain, providers worried more about physical functioning; family and advocates emphasized gender concerns and body image. In the family-centered domain, parental concerns about medication management outweighed those of providers. Advocates reported more stressors regarding communication/information than other stakeholders. Conclusion: Variability exists across stakeholder groups in the key concerns affecting young children/families with DSD. Interdisciplinary DSD healthcare team development should account for varying perspectives when counseling families and planning treatment. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据