4.2 Article

Different Effects of Aliskiren and Losartan on Fibrinolysis and Insulin Sensitivity in Hypertensive Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

期刊

HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 892-896

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1263123

关键词

PAI-1 antigen; tPA activity; AT1R blockers; renin inhibition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of aliskiren and losartan on fibrinolysis and insulin sensitivity (IS) in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. After 2-week placebo period, 76 outpatients with mild to moderate hypertension and metabolic syndrome were randomized to aliskiren 300 mg od or losartan 100 mg od for 12 weeks. Clinic blood pressure (BP), plasma PAI-1 antigen, and tPA activity were evaluated after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. At the end of each treatment period patients performed an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp and IS was assessed by glucose infusion rate (GIR). Both aliskiren and losartan induced a significant and similar SBP/DBP reduction (-15.6/10.7 mmHg and -15.5/10.5 mmHg, p < 0.001 vs. baseline, respectively). Both drugs decreased PAI-1 antigen and activity after 2 weeks of treatment; subsequently, only the decreasing effect of aliskiren was sustained throughout the 12 weeks [-7.5 ng/ml (-31 %) p < 0.05 vs. baseline], while with losartan PAI-1 increased at week 12 [+ 3.6 ng/ml (+ 15 %), p < 0.05 vs. baseline and p < 0.01 vs. aliskiren)]. The tPA activity showed no significant change with aliskiren and a decrease with losartan [-0.04 IU/ml (-8%), p < 0.05 vs. baseline and p < 0.01 vs. aliskiren]. Aliskiren significantly increased GIR [+ 1.4 mg/min/kg (+ 28 %), p < 0.01 vs. baseline] while losartan did not change it [+ 0.2 mg/min/kg (+ 4 %), NS vs. baseline, p < 0.05 vs. aliskiren)]. These results indicated that in this type of patients, despite similar BP reduction, aliskiren improved the fibrinolytic balance as well as IS, while losartan worsened the fibrinolytic balance and did not affect IS. The clinical relevance of these different effects remains to be clarified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据