4.0 Article

Effects of microcurrent application alone or in combination with topical Hypericum perforatum L. and Arnica montana L. on surgically induced wound healing in Wistar rats

期刊

HOMEOPATHY
卷 101, 期 3, 页码 147-153

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2012.05.006

关键词

Arnica; Hypericum; Microcurrent; Wistar rat; Wound healing

资金

  1. Fundacao Herminio Ometto

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: This study evaluated the wound healing activity of microcurrent application alone or in combination with topical Hypericum perforatum L. and Arnica montana L. on skin surgical incision surgically induced on the back of Wistar rats. Design: The animals were randomly divided into six groups: (1) no intervention (control group); (2) microcurrent application (10 mu A/2 min); (3) topical application of gel containing H. perforatum; (4) topical application of H. perforatum gel and microcurrent (10 mu A/2 min); (5) topical application of gel containing A. montana; (6) topical application of A. montana gel and microcurrent (10 mu A/2 min). Tissue samples were obtained on the 2nd, 6th and 10th days after injury and submitted to structural and morphometric analysis. Results and conclusion: Differences in wound healing were observed between treatments when compared to the control group. Microcurrent application alone or combined with H. perforatum gel or A. montana gel exerted significant effects on wound healing in this experimental model in all of the study parameters (P < 0.05) when compared to the control group with positive effects seen regarding newly formed tissue, number of newly formed blood vessels and percentage of mature collagen fibers. The morphometric data confirmed the structural findings. In conclusion, application of H. perforatum or A. montana was effective on experimental wound healing when compared to control, but significant differences in the parameters studied were only observed when these treatments were combined with microcurrent application. Homeopathy (2012) 101, 147-153.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据