4.6 Article

Topochemical investigations of cell walls in developing xylem of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)

期刊

HOLZFORSCHUNG
卷 63, 期 4, 页码 482-490

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/HF.2009.079

关键词

beech (Fagus sylvatica); cellular UV-microspectrophotometry (UMSP); cell wall; fibres; lignin; topochemical analysis; transmission electron microscopy (TEM); vessels; wood formation

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P4-0015]
  2. LLP ERASMUS bilateral agreement between the University of Ljubljana and the University of Hamburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Formation and lignification of xylem cells in mature beech ( Fagus sylvatica L.) trees growing in a forest site in Slovenia (468 degrees N, 14 degrees 40' E, 400 m a.s.l.) were studied on the cellular and subcellular level. Samples containing the cambial zone and developing xylem were taken from six beech trees every week throughout the 2006 vegetation period. Cell wall thickening and lignification in individual cell wall layers and cell types were determined by light microscopy, cellular UV-microspectrophotometry and transmission electron microscopy, respectively. Cell division started between the 18th and the 24th of April 2006. Lignification began in the newly formed xylem tissue on the 2nd of May. After 1 month, the developing earlywood portion contained fully differentiated vessels with completed wall deposition and lignification, and differentiated fibres and axial parenchyma became visible after 2 months. At the end of cambial cell division on the 9th August, the differentiation of the most recently formed fibres in the terminal zone of the growth ring continued for approximately 4 weeks. This indicates that the process of lignification in earlywood is slower than in latewood. The high temporal resolution of the investigated processes and the combination of the above-mentioned microscopic techniques provides a detailed insight into the process of cell wall thickening and lignification of woody tissue in beech.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据