4.6 Article

Self-Assembly of a Designed Alternating Arginine/Phenylalanine Oligopeptide

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 31, 期 15, 页码 4513-4523

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00253

关键词

-

资金

  1. FAPESP [2014/03514-8, 2012/15481-1, 2013/12997-0]
  2. Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award
  3. CNPq
  4. INCT-FCx
  5. Diamond Light Source, UK [SM10083-1]
  6. ESRF, Grenoble [MX 1620, MX1666]
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L020599/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/L020599/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A model octapeptide peptide consisting of an alternating sequence of arginine (Arg) and phenylalanine (Phe) residues, namely, [Arg-Phe](4), was prepared, and its self-assembly in solution studied. The simple alternating [Arg-Phe](4) peptide sequence allows for unique insights into the aggregation process and the structure of the self-assembled motifs. Fluorescence and UV-vis assays were used to determine critical aggregation concentrations, corresponding to the formation of oligomeric species and beta-sheet rich structures organized into both spheroidal aggregates and highly ordered fibrils. Electron and atomic force microscopy images show globular aggregates and long unbranched fibers with diameters ranging from similar to 4 nm up to similar to 40 nm. Infrared and circular dichroism spectroscopy show the formation of beta-sheet structures. X-ray diffraction on oriented stalks show that the peptide fibers have an internal lamellar structure, with an orthorhombic unit cell with parameters a similar to 27.6 angstrom, b similar to 9.7 angstrom, and c similar to 9.6 angstrom. In situ small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) shows the presence of low molecular weight oligomers in equilibrium with mature fibers which are likely made up from 5 or 6 intertwined protofilarnents. Finally, weak gel solutions are probed under gentle shear, suggesting the ability of these arginine-rich fibers to form networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据