4.1 Article

Reduction in circulating markers of endothelial dysfunction in HIV-infected patients during antiretroviral therapy

期刊

HIV MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 79-87

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2008.00661.x

关键词

ART; atherosclerosis; endothelial markers; HIV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Antiretroviral therapy ( ART) in HIV-infected patients is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Circulating markers of endothelial dysfunction may be used to study early atherogenesis. The aim of our study was to investigate changes in such markers during initiation of ART. Methods In 115 HIV-positive treatment-naive patients, plasma lipids, E-selectin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1), tissue-type plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (tPAI-1) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured before and after 2 and 14 months of ART. A control group of 30 healthy subjects was included. Values are mean +/- standard error of the mean. Results Prior to treatment, HIV-infected patients had elevated levels of sICAM-1 ( 296 +/- 24 vs. 144 +/- 12 ng/mL), tPAI-1 ( 18 473 +/- 1399 vs. 5490 +/- 576 pg/mL) and hsCRP ( 28 060 +/- 5530 vs. 6665 +/- 2063 ng/mL) compared with controls (P < 0.001). In contrast, sVCAM-1 and E-selectin did not differ between the groups. Initiation of ART resulted in significantly lower levels of E-selectin (15.1 +/- 0.8; P < 0.01), sICAM-1 ( 248 +/- 12 ng/mL; P < 0.05), sVCAM-1 ( 766 +/- 33 ng/mL; P < 0.001) and hsCRP ( 14 708 +/- 2358 ng/mL; P < 0.001) after 2 months, which remained reduced at 14 months. tPAI-1 was not influenced by initiation of ART. Conclusions Markers of endothelial dysfunction were elevated in treatment-naive HIV-infected patients and were related to HIV RNA viral load. Initiation of ART reduced the levels of the majority of these markers. The positive effect of ART initiation was dependent on the duration of HIV infection prior to treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据