3.9 Article

Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc Versus Efavirenz, Both With Zidovudine/Lamivudine: 96-Week Results From the MERIT Study

期刊

HIV CLINICAL TRIALS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 127-132

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1310/hct1103-125

关键词

efavirenz; HIV-1; maraviroc; treatment naive; virologic response

资金

  1. Pfizer Global Research and Development
  2. Pfizer, Inc.
  3. ViiV Healthcare
  4. Merck Sharp Dohme
  5. Tibotec
  6. Stendhal
  7. Abbott
  8. Gilead
  9. BMS
  10. GlaxoSmithKline
  11. Ardea Biosciences Avexa
  12. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  13. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  14. Pain Therapeutics
  15. Progenics
  16. Tobira Therapeutics
  17. Virxsys

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The MERIT study evaluated maraviroc versus efavirenz, both with zidovudine/lamivudine, in treatment-naive patients with CCR5-tropic (R5) HIV-1. Post hoc analyses previously assessed week 48 outcomes in patients rescreened with R5 virus by a more sensitive tropism assay. Methods: Week 96 efficacy (post hoc, n = 614) and safety (n = 721) were assessed. Results: Proportions of subjects <50 copies/mL (58.8% maraviroc, 62.7% efavirenz) and time to loss of virologic response (TLOVR) responders (<50 copies/mL: 60.5% vs 60.7%) were similar. Maraviroc recipients had greater CD4 increases (+212 vs+ 171 cells/mm(3)) and fewer adverse event discontinuations (6.1% vs 15.5%), malignancies, and category C events. Conclusion: Week 96 data confirm week 48 observations in MERIT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据