3.9 Article

Rates of HCV Treatment Eligibility Among HCV-Monoinfected and HCV/HIV-Coinfected Patients in Tertiary Care Referral Centers

期刊

HIV CLINICAL TRIALS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 25-32

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1310/hct1001-25

关键词

coinfection; comorbidities; contraindications; HCV; HIV; treatment eligibility

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA016175-01A1]
  2. National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases [K01 AI070001-A1]
  3. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine award [K24 AT001676]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Treatment eligibility rates in patients with HCV monoinfection have not been directly compared with patients with HCV/HIV coinfection. These data are important for planning interventions to optimize HCV management. Method: We enrolled consecutive HCV-monoinfected and HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects presenting to hepatology and HIV clinics at three academic medical centers. Data were obtained through structured subject and provider interviews and a review of medical records. Results: Of the 399 subjects enrolled, 241 (60%) were HCV monoinfected and 158 (40%) were HCV/HIV coinfected. HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects were less likely to have indications for treatment based on HCV RNA positivity (70.9% vs. 81.3%, p=.04) but were more likely to have at least one contraindication to treatment (81.6% vs. 64.9%, p<.004). Depression and ongoing alcohol and injection drug abuse were more common in the HCV/HIV-coinfected persons. HCV/HIV-coinfected persons were less likely to undergo liver biopsy or to ever get treatment for HCV. Conclusions: HCV/HIV-coinfected persons are less likely to undergo a liver biopsy or be eligible for HCV therapy and are more likely to have treatment contraindications compared with HCV-monoinfected subjects. Strategies to address modifiable factors (e.g., depression, substance abuse) may enhance treatment eligibility in HCV-infected populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据