4.6 Article

Large B cell lymphoma presenting initially in bone marrow, liver and spleen: an aggressive entity associated frequently with haemophagocytic syndrome

期刊

HISTOPATHOLOGY
卷 57, 期 6, 页码 785-795

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03709.x

关键词

aggressive behaviour; bone marrow; clinicopathological features; cytogenetics; diffuse large B cell lymphoma

资金

  1. National Cheng Kung University Hospital [NCKUH-9702008]
  2. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 97-2320-B-006-022-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large B cell lymphoma presenting initially in bone marrow, liver and spleen: an aggressive entity associated frequently with haemophagocytic syndrome Aims: To describe diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) presenting initially in bone marrow, liver and spleen (BLS-type) without lymphadenopathy. Methods and results: The clinicopathological and cytogenetic features of 11 such cases (eight men, three women; mean age: 62.7 years are described). Usually presenting with fever and haemophagocytic syndrome suggesting infection and complicating timely diagnosis, bone marrow examination showed patchy and interstitial infiltration of large tumour cells without sinusoidal involvement. All cases had a high Ki-67 index (>= 90%), commonly a non-germinal centre/activated B cell immunophenotype and were negative for Epstein-Barr virus and human herpesvirus 6 and 8. The more frequent cytogenetic changes involved chromosomal loci 14q32 and 9p24, as well as del(3)(q21), add(7)(p22), t(3;6), del(8)(p22), +18 and add(19)(p13). Clinical behaviour was very aggressive, with a 2-year survival rate of 18% (45% of patients died within 3 weeks). High-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation prolonged survival in one patient. Conclusions: Although it shares with intravascular LBCL a subtle presentation and an aggressive clinical course, this primary BLS large cell lymphoma variant is distinguished by lacking an intravascular component and having different cytogenetic findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据