4.3 Article

Spatial and Stimulus-Type Tuning in the LEC, MEC, POR, PrC, CA1, and CA3 During Spontaneous Item Recognition Memory

期刊

HIPPOCAMPUS
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 1425-1438

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22195

关键词

lateral entorhinal cortex; medial entorhinal cortex; postrhinal cortex; recognition memory; Arc (Arg3; 1)

资金

  1. FORUM [F699-10]
  2. Mercator Stiftung
  3. International Graduate School of Neurosciences (IGSN)
  4. RUB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the two streams hypothesis, the lateral entorhinal (LEC) and the perirhinal (PrC) cortices process information related to items (a what stream), the postrhinal (POR) and the medial entorhinal cortices (MEC) process spatial information (a where stream), and both types of information are integrated in the hippocampus (HIP). However, within the framework of memory function, only the HIP is reliably shown to preferentially process spatial information, and the PrC items' features. In contrast, the role of the LEC and MEC in memory is virtually unexplored, and conflicting results emerge for the POR. Moreover, the specific contribution of the hippocampal subfields CA1 and CA3 to spatial and non-spatial memory is not thoroughly understood. To investigate which of these areas is specifically tuned to spatial demands or stimulus identity (odor or object), we assessed the pattern of activation of these areas during recognition memory by detecting the immediate-early gene Arc, commonly used as a marker of neuronal activation. We report that all MTL areas were recruited during the spatial and the non-spatial tasks. However, the LEC, MEC, POR, and CA1 were activated to a comparable level in spatial and non-spatial tasks, while the PrC was tuned to stimulus-type, not spatial demands, and CA3 to spatial demands but not stimulus-type. Results are discussed within the frame of a recent model suggesting that the MTL could be segregated in terms of memory processes, such as recollection and familiarity, rather than information content. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据