4.3 Article

Lateral entorhinal cortex is critical for novel object-context recognition

期刊

HIPPOCAMPUS
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 352-366

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22095

关键词

episodic; memory; hippocampus; associative; context

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I019367/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I019367/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BB/I019367/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Episodic memory incorporates information about specific events or occasions including spatial locations and the contextual features of the environment in which the event took place. It has been modeled in rats using spontaneous exploration of novel configurations of objects, their locations, and the contexts in which they are presented. While we have a detailed understanding of how spatial location is processed in the brain relatively little is known about where the nonspatial contextual components of episodic memory are processed. Initial experiments measured c-fos expression during an object-context recognition (OCR) task to examine which networks within the brain process contextual features of an event. Increased c-fos expression was found in the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC; a major hippocampal afferent) during OCR relative to control conditions. In a subsequent experiment it was demonstrated that rats with lesions of LEC were unable to recognize object-context associations yet showed normal object recognition and normal context recognition. These data suggest that contextual features of the environment are integrated with object identity in LEC and demonstrate that recognition of such object-context associations requires the LEC. This is consistent with the suggestion that contextual features of an event are processed in LEC and that this information is combined with spatial information from medial entorhinal cortex to form episodic memory in the hippocampus. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据