4.3 Article

Grid Cells and Theta as Oscillatory Interference: Electrophysiological Data From Freely Moving Rats

期刊

HIPPOCAMPUS
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 1175-1185

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20510

关键词

hippocampus; entorhinal cortex; grid cell; theta; EEG; navigation; computational modeling; membrane potential oscillations

资金

  1. EU
  2. MRC
  3. Wellcome Trust, UK
  4. MRC [G0501672] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G0501672] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The oscillatory interference model (Burgess et al. (2007) Hippocampus 17:801-812) explains the generation of spatially stable, regular firing patterns by medial entorhinal cortical (mEC) grid cells in terms of the interference between velocity-controlled oscillators (VCOs) with different preferred directions. This model predicts specific relationships between the intrinsic firing frequency and spatial scale of grid cell firing, the EEG theta frequency, and running speed (Burgess, 2008). Here, we use spectral analyses of EEG and of spike autocorrelograms to estimate the intrinsic firing frequency of grid cells, and the concurrent theta frequency, in mEC Layer 11 in freely moving rats. The intrinsic firing frequency of grid cells increased with running speed and decreased with grid scale, according to the quantitative prediction of the model. Similarly, theta frequency increased with running speed, which was also predicted by the model. An alternative Moire interference model (Blair et al., 2007) predicts a direction-dependent variation in intrinsic firing frequency, which was not found. Our results Suggest that interference between VCOs generates the spatial firing patterns of entorhinal grid cells according to the oscillatory interference model. They also provide specific constraints on this model of grid cell firing and have more general implications for viewing neuronal processing in terms of interfering oscillatory processes. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据