4.2 Article

Limited Incision With Thorough Elevation Palatoplasty Technical Evolution for Superior Results in Cleft Repair of the Secondary Palate

期刊

ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY
卷 74, 期 2, 页码 187-190

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31829565d8

关键词

LITE palatoplasty; cleft palate; secondary palate; limited incision with thorough elevation

类别

资金

  1. SNUBH Research Fund [02-2012-063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: All kinds of palatoplasty emphasize elongating the soft palate and reconstructing the velar musculature without complication. We present the limited incision with thorough elevation (LITE) palatoplasty that leaves the anterior margin of the hard palate intact, achieving a fully movable bipedicled flap for complete closure and an adequate functioning velar muscular sling. Methods: Fifty-six patients consecutively underwent the LITE palatoplasty. The patients were diagnosed with varying degrees of cleft of the secondary palate. The length of the soft palate was measured, preoperatively and post-operatively, to quantify the lengthening effect of the surgical procedure. The LITE palatoplasty lengthens the soft palate by full mobilization of the velar musculature and reconstruction of the muscles. The LITE palatoplasty also completely repairs the hard palate and leaves no raw surfaces, which can be disadvantageous to the maxillary growth. Results: The average length of soft palate was 18.5 +/- 3.1 mm preoperatively, and the increased length of the soft palate was 5.06 +/- 2.41 mm (27.3 +/- 17.4%). There were no complications including fistula formation, hematoma, or wound problems. After 2 years of operation, only 2 patients who had multiple congenital problems showed grade 1 hypernasality in speech assessment. Conclusions: The LITE palatoplasty gives satisfactory results in elongating the soft palate and reconstructing a functional velar sling without leaving any raw surfaces that can be detrimental to healing and facial growth. And there was a better speech outcome without complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据