4.7 Article

Exploring associations between urban green, street design and walking: Results from the Greater London boroughs

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 112-125

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.013

关键词

Urban green; NDVI; Street trees; Urban morphology; sDNA; Walking; LTDS

资金

  1. UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) [ES/L003201/1]
  2. ESRC [ES/L003201/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L003201/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, a series of studies have highlighted the positive effects of urban green on individual activity behaviour and health. In this paper, we examine salutogenic environment effects of urban green upon walking behaviour and how such effects are mediated by built environment configuration and street-level physical accessibility. The dwelling locations of N = 15,354 respondents of the London Travel Demand Survey were geocoded and individual walking behaviour was extracted from the travel diary. A 0.5-m resolution normalized difference vegetation (NDVI) index derived from spectral reflectance measurements in remotely sensed colour infrared data was employed as an objective measure of greenness, while density of street trees acted as proxy of perceived environmental quality in street corridors. A network model of street-level physical accessibility was developed using spatial Design Network Analysis (sDNA). Logistic regression models reported a significant association of odds of walking with density of street trees and street-level betweenness (a measure of street network connectivity), while sensitivity analyses with continuous regression models for participants doing some walking indicated beneficial associations of distance walked with NDVI greenness and street trees. The results illustrate the necessity for targeted intervention strategies in activity-friendly planning via greening and optimized physical design of urban built environments. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据