4.3 Article

YEAR-ROUND MIXED-AGE SHELTER AGGREGATIONS IN DUVAUCEL'S GECKOS (HOPLODACTYLUS DUVAUCELII)

期刊

HERPETOLOGICA
卷 70, 期 4, 页码 395-406

出版社

HERPETOLOGISTS LEAGUE
DOI: 10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-13-00056

关键词

Communal refugia; Diplodactylidae; Grouping; New Zealand; Sociality

类别

资金

  1. Massey University
  2. Landcare Research (Manaaki Whenua, FRST) [CO9X0503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little information on the behavioral ecology and social organization of New Zealand's diplodactylid geckos is available. At least two species may be gregarious and share shelters, but data on the extent and possible function of this behavior are lacking. We examined the spatial distribution patterns of Duvaucel's Geckos in diurnal retreats over the four seasons. We tested whether geckos formed aggregations more often than expected by chance, and investigated whether or not the thermal properties of used shelters, gecko body temperatures and group composition affected aggregation patterns. Duvaucel's Geckos utilized a range of natural structures as diurnal shelters and showed a tendency to aggregate throughout the year (47-71% of individuals). Mixed-sex groups of up to eight individuals, including juveniles, occurred year round. Aggregations never contained more than one adult male and typically consisted of a male-female pair. Shelter-sharing adult males were larger than solitary males. Juveniles sheltered in close association with adults of either sex throughout the study. Shelter thermal properties did not appear to influence aggregative behavior. Aggregation patterns fluctuated seasonally, but the factors affecting these distribution patterns remain unclear. The occurrence of year-round shelter aggregations and frequent male-female and adult-juvenile associations indicate that this species might possess a complex social system. Further research examining the social and genetic relationships between group members, juvenile dispersal rates, and the temporal stability of aggregations is required to confirm the degree of complexity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据