4.5 Article

Patterns of cyto-nuclear linkage disequilibrium in Silene latifolia: genomic heterogeneity and temporal stability

期刊

HEREDITY
卷 112, 期 2, 页码 99-104

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.79

关键词

cyto-nuclear; linkage disequilibrium; metapopulations; spatiotemporal; Silene

资金

  1. NSF [1050331, 9221175]
  2. NSF DEB [0919335]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [1050331, 0919335, 9221175] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-random association of alleles in the nucleus and cytoplasmic organelles, or cyto-nuclear linkage disequilibrium (LD), is both an important component of a number of evolutionary processes and a statistical indicator of others. The evolutionary significance of cyto-nuclear LD will depend on both its magnitude and how stable those associations are through time. Here, we use a longitudinal population genetic data set to explore the magnitude and temporal dynamics of cyto-nuclear disequilibria through time. We genotyped 135 and 170 individuals from 16 and 17 patches of the plant species Silene latifolia in Southwestern VA, sampled in 1993 and 2008, respectively. Individuals were genotyped at 14 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers and a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the mitochondrial gene, atp1. Normalized LD (D') between nuclear and cytoplasmic loci varied considerably depending on which nuclear locus was considered (ranging from 0.005-0.632). Four of the 14 cyto-nuclear associations showed a statistically significant shift over approximately seven generations. However, the overall magnitude of this disequilibrium was largely stable over time. The observed origin and stability of cyto-nuclear LD is most likely caused by the slow admixture between anciently diverged lineages within the species' newly invaded range, and the local spatial structure and metapopulation dynamics that are known to structure genetic variation in this system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据