4.5 Article

Microsatellite genetic differentiation among populations of the Trinidadian guppy

期刊

HEREDITY
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 425-434

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.7

关键词

F-ST; genetic structure; guppies; landscape genetics; microsatellites; phylogeography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insight into the processes of evolutionary change can be obtained by studying the distribution of genetic diversity among populations. Such diversity can be shaped by historical colonization events, population connectivity and adaptation to local selection pressures. Here we examine genetic differentiation of Trinidadian guppies, Poecilia reticulata, by genotyping 373 individuals from 15 populations located in three drainages (northern coast, Caroni and Oropouche) with 7 microsatellite loci. Our data provide little evidence to support previous claims of two major genetic lineages of guppies in northern Trinidad but instead suggest a more complex pattern of gene flow among populations from different drainages. First, some of the populations in the Caroni drainage show genetic signatures similar to those in the Oropouche drainage. Second, the populations in the northern coast are all highly differentiated from those in either the Caroni or Oropouche drainages. Despite differing selection regimes owing to predation pressure, populations from upstream and downstream locales typically cluster together, albeit upstream populations consistently have less genetic variability than the corresponding downstream population. There is, however, no overall pattern of isolation by distance. We also find evidence that an artificially transplanted population from the Caroni drainage is successfully invading into other populations within the Oropouche system. Our analysis details the genetic and phylogeographic structure of Trinidadian guppies in the northern range and provides insight into evolutionary processes at different timescales that have shaped genetic heterogeneity in this fish. Heredity (2009) 102, 425-434; doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.7; published online 18 February 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据