4.5 Article

Intestinal permeability and complications in liver cirrhosis: A prospective cohort study

期刊

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 200-207

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.01054.x

关键词

hepatic encephalopathy; intestinal permeability; lactulose mannitol ratio; liver cirrhosis; spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Increased intestinal permeability (IP) has been implicated as an important factor for bacterial translocation (BT), leading to bacteremia and endotoxemia, resulting in various septic complications, variceal bleeding (VB), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and death in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). This study was planned to assess IP in patients with LC and follow them for the occurrence of complications. Methods: Patients with Child B and C cirrhosis without a history of disease-related complications were followed up for 6months. IP was measured by lactulose and mannitol excretion ratio (LMR) in patients and 50 healthy controls (HC). Serum endotoxin levels were also assessed in 48 patients and 20 HC. Results: Eighty patients (74 male), 41 (51.3%) Child B and 56 (70%) Child C, with a mean age of 40.7 +/- 9.8years were enrolled. IP was increased in 28 (35%) patients. LMR of patients was higher than HC (patients vs HC=0.0238 [0.00101.557] vs 0.0166 [0.00180.720]; P=0.007]. No significant difference was seen in the LMR of patients among various Child classes and etiologies. Serum endotoxin levels (GMU/mL) were higher in patients than HC (patients vs HC=1.42 [0.682.13] vs 0.994 [0.0671.382]; P=0.001), but comparable between patients with abnormal and normal IP. At follow up, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications like spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, HRS, VB, HE and death between patients with abnormal and normal IP. Conclusion: IP was increased in 35% of patients with LC; however, it was not associated with a higher incidence of disease-related complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据