4.5 Article

Biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid predicts long-term outcome in Japanese patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

期刊

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 310-317

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2011.00782.x

关键词

biochemical response; primary biliary cirrhosis; ursodeoxycholic acid

资金

  1. Intractable Hepato-Biliary Study Group in Japan
  2. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: There is an ongoing need for predictors of long-term outcomes for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been introduced to predict development of symptoms by our group (Ehime criteria) and to predict long-term outcomes in Western countries (Paris, Barcelona and Rotterdam criteria). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether these criteria are also useful to predict long-term outcomes in Japanese patients with PBC. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 227 Japanese patients with PBC. Patients taking UDCA with an observation period of more than 6 months were included in the study. Data collection included demographics, biochemical and serological markers, and histological stage. Four different criteria regarding biochemical response to UDCA were compared and evaluated. Results: In total, 138 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent analysis. Using the Ehime criteria, the transplant-free survival rate was significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (P = 0.010). The Paris criteria also predicted long-term outcomes in our population (P = 0.003), whereas the Barcelona and Rotterdam criteria showed no such association (P = 0.282 and P = 0.553, respectively). Conclusion: Good biochemical response to UDCA according to the Ehime and Paris criteria is associated with long-term outcome in Japanese patients with PBC and allows identification of non-responders who may benefit from further trials. Finally, Ehime criteria should be validated in a different patient cohort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据