4.5 Article

Microencapsule technique protects hepatocytes from cryoinjury

期刊

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 593-600

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00311.x

关键词

cryoinjury; cryopreservation; hepatocyte transplantation; microencapsulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Hepatocyte transplantation is a potential alternative to whole organ liver transplantation. To realize this procedure, a hepatocyte bank system capable of supplying large numbers of hepatocytes must be established. We previously reported an easy method for cryopreserving hepatocytes using a microencapsulation technique. Here, we investigated how cryoinjury to microencapsulated hepatocytes could be avoided during cryopreservation. Methods: Hepatocytes from Sprague-Dawley rats were harvested in situ using a two-step ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)/collagenase digestion protocol. The cells were microencapsulated using alginate-poly L-lysine. The microencapsulated hepatocytes were put into vials and immediately immersed in liquid nitrogen. The growth of ice crystals in the vials containing the microencapsulated hepatocytes was observed using cryomicroscopy. The microencapsulated hepatocytes were sectioned for ultrastructural examination to investigate their intracellular conditions. Finally, total RNA was isolated from the cryopreserved microencapsulated hepatocytes and analyzed for hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF) using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. Results: Cryomicroscopy showed that the alginate microencapsulation technique protected the hepatocytes from physical damage caused by the growth of extracellular ice crystals. Ultrastructural examination revealed that the intracellular environment of the microencapsulated hepatocytes was maintained. The RT-PCR analysis additionally suggested that the alginate gel also maintained the HNF level. Conclusion: Our microencapsulation technique protects hepatocytes from cryoinjury. This novel technique could be utilized by hepatocyte banks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据