4.6 Article

Opposite effects of high and low doses of interleukin-2 on T cell-mediated hepatitis in mice (interleukin-2 on hepatitis)

期刊

HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 641-648

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-010-9196-0

关键词

Concanavalin A; Hepatitis; Interleukin 2

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30630059, 30721002]
  2. National 973 Basic Science Project [2007CB512405, 2007CB512807]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concanavalin A (Con A)-induced hepatitis is an extensively used animal model of T cell-mediated acute hepatitis. A variety of cytokines, including interleukin 4 (IL-4), interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), have been shown to play important roles in Con A-induced liver injury. However, the role of IL-2, a critical cytokine in the development and function of T cells and a clinical therapeutics for virus infection and tumor, has not been carefully examined in this model. In this study, we investigated the function of IL-2 in Con A-induced hepatitis by using various strategies of rhIL-2 pretreatment. We treated mice with two rhIL-2 administration strategies: a single injection of high dose of rhIL-2 (IL-2(hi), 50 x 10(3) U/mouse) and four injections of low dose of rhIL-2 (IL-2(4lo), 5 x 10(3) U/mouse). IL-2(hi) pretreatment ameliorated Con A-induced liver injury, while IL-2(4lo) aggravated Con A-induced liver injury. IL-2(hi) pretreatment reduced Con A-induced elevation of serum TNF-alpha while IL-2(4lo) pretreatment did not. Serum IL-4 and TNF-alpha were high 6 h after Con A injection in IL-2(4lo) mice, while it was undetectable in IL-2(hi) and non-pretreated mice. IL-2(hi) pretreatment reduced Con A-induced accumulation of T cells in liver while IL-2(4lo) pretreatment increased accumulation of NK cells. Various strategies of rhIL-2 administration play different roles in Con A-induced hepatitis, suggesting the importance of IL-2 administrative regime in clinical liver diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据