4.8 Article

Long-Term Efficacy of Rosiglitazone in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Results of the Fatty Liver Improvement by Rosiglitazone Therapy (FLIRT 2) Extension Trial

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 445-453

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/hep.23270

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Short-term trials of glitazones in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) yielded controversial histological results. Longer treatment might result in additional improvement. After a 1-year randomized trial, 53 patients underwent a control liver biopsy and were enrolled in an open-label extension trial of rosiglitazone (RSG), 8 mg/day for 2 additional years. In all, 44 completed the extension phase including 40 with a third liver biopsy. Of these, 22 received placebo (PLB) in the randomized phase (PLB-RSG), and 18 RSG (RSG-RSG). During the 2-year extension phase serum insulin decreased by 26%, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) by 30%, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) by 24%. However, there was no significant change in the mean NASH activity score (NAS) (3.8 +/- 2.11 versus 3.68 +/- 1.8), ballooning score, fibrosis stage (1.76 +/- 1.18 versus 1.85 +/- 1.19), or area of fibrosis by micromorphometry (4.43% +/- 0.68 to 5.54% +/- 0.68). In the PLB-RSG group steatosis significantly decreased after 2 years of RSG (median decrease of 15%); in the RSG-RSG group, after an initial decline in the first year of 20%, 2 additional years of RSG did not result in further improvement. Likewise, there was no improvement in the NAS score, ballooning, intralobular inflammation, fibrosis stage, or area of fibrosis with 2 additional years of RSG in the RSG-RSG group. Conclusion: Rosiglitazone has a substantial antisteatogenic effect in the first year of treatment without additional benefit with longer therapy despite a maintained effect on insulin sensitivity and transaminase levels. This suggests that improving insulin sensitivity might not be sufficient in NASH and that additional targets of therapy for liver injury should be explored. (HEPATOLOGY 2010;51:445-453.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据