4.8 Article

Hepatic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by tetracycline-regulated hepatocyte nuclear factor 3β

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 597-606

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.22362

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) are expected to be a potential source of cells for transplantation. Although recent reports have shown that isolated MSCs can differentiate into hepatocytes, the efficiency of differentiation is insufficient for therapeutic application. To circumvent this problem, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms of hepatic differentiation of human BM-MSCs. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 beta (HNF3 beta), a forkhead/winged helix transcription factor, is essential for liver development. In the present study, we established a tetracycline (Tet)-regulated expression system for HNF3 beta in UE7T-13 BM-MSCs. HNF3 beta expression significantly enhanced expression of albumin, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), tyrosine amino transferase (TAT) and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) genes. The differentiated cells showed hepatocyte-specific functions including glycogen production and urea secretion. During treatment with the Tet-on system for 8 days, over 80% of UE7T-13 cells turned out to express albumin. Furthermore, the combination of Tet with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) efficiently induced the genes such as albumin and TAT, which are associated with maturity of hepatocytes; however, it suppressed genes such as AFP and EpCAM, which are associated with immaturity of hepatocytes, suggesting that Tct-induced HNF3 beta expression sensitizes BM-MSCs to bFGF signals. Finally, the results of the present study suggest that down-regulation of Wnt/beta-catenin signals caused by translocation of beta-catenin to cytoplasmic membrane is associated with hepatic differentiation of human BM-MSCs. Conclusion: HNF3 beta expression induced efficient differentiation of UE7T-13 human BM-NISCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据