4.4 Article

Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease:: A case-control study

期刊

HELICOBACTER
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 352-360

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2008.00624.x

关键词

Helicobacter pylori; gastroesophageal reflux; GERD

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [K08DK02697, R01 DK063616-05, R01 DK063616, K08 DK002697, R01 DK63616] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Gastric colonization with Helicobacter pylori is a proposed protective factor against gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but little population-based data exist and other data conflict. Methods: We conducted a case-control study within the membership of a large integrated health-care system that compared GERD-free subjects with two groups: subjects with a physician-assigned GERD diagnosis and randomly selected members with self-described weekly GERD symptoms. Subjects completed interviews, GERD questionnaires, and antibody testing for H. pylori and its cagA protein. Results: Serologic data were available for 301 physician-assigned GERD patients, 81 general membership subjects with GERD symptoms, and 175 general membership subjects without GERD symptoms. Physician-assigned GERD patients were less likely to have H. pylori antibodies than GERD-free member controls (odds ratio (OR) = 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.47); there was also an inverse association between H. pylori and GERD symptom severity (OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.08-0.41; severe or very severe symptoms) and GERD frequency (OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.38; for symptoms at least weekly). The association was stronger among persons with erosive GERD and was similar between H. pylori-positive subjects with and without cagA. There was no association among persons who were cagA positive, but H. pylori negative. Similar findings were found in analyses of the general membership with self-described GERD symptoms. Conclusions: H. pylori antibody status was inversely associated with a GERD diagnosis and GERD symptoms compared with a general membership population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据