4.4 Article

Acute electrical and hemodynamic effects of multisite left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in the dyssynchronous canine heart

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 119-125

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.10.018

关键词

Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Multisite left ventricular pacing; Heart failure; Left bundle branch block; Cardiac mapping; Biventricular pacing

资金

  1. la Federation Francaise de Cardiologie
  2. French government's l'Agence National de la Recherche au titre du programme Investissements d'Avenir [ANR-10-LAHU-04]
  3. project COHFAR [01C-203]
  4. Dutch Heart Foundation
  5. Medtronic
  6. EBR Systems
  7. Proteus Biomedical
  8. Biological Delivery Systems
  9. MSD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Multisite left ventricular (multi-LV) epicardial pacing has been proposed as an alternative to conventional single-site LV (single-LV) pacing to increase the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy. OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of multi-LV versus single-LV pacing in dogs with left bundle branch block (LBBB). METHODS Studies were performed in 9 anaesthetized dogs with chronic LBBB using 7 LV epicardial electrodes. Each electrode was tested alone and in combination with 1, 2, 3, and 6 other electrodes, the sequence of which was chosen on the basis of practical real-time electrical mapping to determine the site of the latest activation. LV total activation time (LVTAT) and dispersion of repolarization (DRep) were measured by using approximately 100 electrodes around the ventricles. LV contractility was assessed as the maximum derivative of left ventricular pressure (LVdP/dt(max)). RESULTS Single-LV pacing provided, on average, a -4.0% +/- 9.3% change in LVTAT and 0.2% +/- 13.7% change in DRep. Multi-LV pacing markedly decreased both LVTAT and DRep in a stepwise fashion to reach -41.3% +/- 5% (P < .001 for overall comparison) and -14.2% +/- 19.5% (P < .02 for overall comparison) in the septuple-LV pacing configuration, respectively. Single-LV pacing provided a mean increase of 10.7% +/- 7.7% in LVdP/dt(max). LVdP/dt(max) incrementally increased by the addition of pacing electrodes to 16.4% +/- 8.7% (P < .001 for overall comparison). High response to single-LV pacing could not be improved further during multi-LV pacing. CONCLUSIONS Compared with single-LV pacing, multi-LV pacing can considerably reduce both LVTAT and DRep in dogs with LBBB, but the improvement in contractility is limited to conditions where single-LV pacing provides suboptimal improvement. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these acute effects translate in antiarrhythmic properties and better Long-term outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据