4.4 Article

Low-amplitude, left vagus nerve stimulation significantly attenuates ventricular dysfunction and infarct size through prevention of mitochondrial dysfunction during acute ischemia-reperfusion injury

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 1700-1707

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.009

关键词

Vagus nerve stimulation; Ischemia-reperfusion injury; Acetylcholine; Heart; Cardioprotection

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund
  2. Commission on Higher Education TRF-CHE [MRG5580125, BRG5480003, RTA5580006]
  3. Cyberonics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Right cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) provides cardioprotective effects against acute ischemia-reperfusion injury in small animals. However, inconsistent findings have been reported. OBJECTIVE To determine whether low-amplitude, left cervical VNS applied either intermittently or continuously imparts cardioprotection against acute ischemia-reperfusion injury. METHODS Thirty-two isoflurane-anesthetized swine (25-30 kg) were randomized into 4 groups: control (sham operated, no VNS), continuous-VNS (C-VNS; 3.5 mA, 20 Hz), intermittent-VNS (I-VNS; continuously recurring cycles of 21-second ON, 30-second OFF), and I-VNS + atropine (1 mg/kg). Left cervical VNS was applied immediately after left anterior descending artery occlusion (60 minutes) and continued until the end of reperfusion (120 minutes). The ischemic and nonischemic myocardium was harvested for cardiac mitochondrial function assessment. RESULTS VNS significantly reduced infarct size, improved ventricular function, decreased ventricular fibrillation episodes, and attenuated cardiac mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production, depolarization, and swelling, compared with the control group. However, I-VNS produced the most profound cardioprotective effects, particularly infarct size reduction and decreased ventricular fibrillation episodes, compared to both I-VNS + atropine and C-VNS. These beneficial effects of VNS were abolished by atropine. CONCLUSIONS During ischemia-reperfusion injury, both C-VNS and I-VNS provide significant cardioprotective effects compared with I-VNS atropine. These beneficial effects were abolished by muscarinic blockade, suggesting the importance of muscarinic receptor modulation during VNS. The protective effects of VNS could be due to its protection of mitochondrial function during ischemia-reperfusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据