4.4 Article

Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation by cryoballon ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 802-806

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.02.014

关键词

ablation; atrial fibrillation; cryoablation; cryoballoon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins (PVs) has emerged as an effective treatment for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, serious complications raise concern about an even wider application. In terms of safety, cryoenergy has advantages compared with radiofrequency. A new cryoenergy balloon catheter has been recently developed to make AF ablation shorter and safer. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to test the 6-month efficacy of this new device for ablation of paroxysmal AF. METHODS Twenty-one patients with highly symptomatic paroxysmal AF, normal left atrial size, and frequent episodes of AF were included. All PVs were targeted during cryoballoon ablation. Patients received 24-hour Hotter electrocardiograms (ECGs) and event recorder during follow-up after 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS A total of 81 (95%) of 85 PVs could be completely isolated with a single-balloon technique. Procedure time was 165 +/- 35 minutes, and fluoroscopy time was 39 +/- 9 minutes. After 6 months, 86% of the patients were free of symptomatic AF. In two of three patients with recurrence of AF, complete PV isolation has not been achieved initially. After a second procedure (1.04 procedures per patient), 90% of the patients were free of symptomatic AF. Three phrenic nerve palsies occurred during ablation of the right superior PV; two completely resolved after 6 and 9 months, and one is still persisting after 2 months. CONCLUSION This is the first study that reports the results of the new cryoballoon AF ablation approach showing 86% freedom from AF recurrence after 6 months. Cryoballoon PV ablation promises to be effective for patients with paroxysmal AF and normally sized left atria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据